spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: RFJ 21

["Kieron Jarvis" <kieron.jarvis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> It would appear that RFJ 24 addresses the interpretation of the voting on
> these; however, its wording seems to exclude just the cases in question.
"A
> revision of an item which has not become a Ballot Issue" is not an object
> the status of which is in question--if it isn't a Ballot Issue at all, of
> course we wouldn't consider counting votes on it. The important case, "a
> revision of an item made since the item became a Ballot Issue" are
excluded.
>

This was a result of bad sentence construction on my part. Try the same
phrase with these brackets and you should see what I intended to say. "(A
revision of an item) which has not become a Ballot Issue"

XnJester