Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"

Benjamin Bradley on 4 Oct 2000 19:39:10 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
From: Benjamin Bradley <activist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:40:37 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <200010041915.OAA08532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Gee golly gosh batman! you're right!

joel- how do I cancel the first RFJ and just leave the second one?

- You have received mail from Benjamin Bradley. meh.
- http://lostpoet.tripod.com/
- whee life what a rush

> A fruit is an apple.
> 
> which is parently false, because oranges are fruits which aren't apples.

my mom is parently false.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
  - From: Joel Uckelman

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
  - From: Wbfu Xbegorva

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: The Agent Joel Uckelman is not a Player.
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ: reflexivity of "to be"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread