|
Elliott Hird on Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:54:54 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: New Rule
|
- To: Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: New Rule
- From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:54:50 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=y006vPLHBrNBHPs/0fXJKzMO6pvahSJkLAGicBu+44s=; b=da+KYfchaXnfeUG/8uz4N5B7QiQ7Xt1bvqk227pHVJ1o2t4rX0RGqp/8+dlzjPj5MS JTFsT53PFanEoxZFEAtyo11PhVTNthWTyCZuONd3HFjf5qhcvIe2qKWz5lGbmwe7hRbE L6Lg/1V5MnhXvNJbtQfctxx7HUN604ezvB05HxAEhblyS5x/cpjw+vxEX+mwkl3d5Mtm lBzhkxrpKkVd1+OCAyi7hc0pRBDs9v81RtcC8ooTIsWKAXDmiKrVozTKs3u3Cs7OwJSa ZjvN4YduPek1R4iSYfip6tjNEhmyVcPbZ6mVZXvRyf72gl//pguzpFor6zohT4JrQqxQ NoqA==
- In-reply-to: <CAP=UV6rALEju_imF5YN9eiPddx0ShbfbzHXk0E6Tded-ii58WQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAHd7M8=e0gfFmeif8M1Sf8fZ8hPzUd13tKDVgS1kQ=86v5Amhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAxyauCun3SQu6ZeCbXKExDJUtHUT8jgcZyudPwJ+aaU+jttXg@mail.gmail.com> <C0358626B5C04947828C17437566FF24@indistinct.org> <CAAxyauCfd3tiZUYR2NaE7J62rg5JYcdV2L23Wpt_Oqc8u=P+pA@mail.gmail.com> <4F74C395.2040507@socal.rr.com> <CAAxyauA7uDn=KFCik2zwY4Lk7ghXcHGLBS-hFBBkcFvEF1+aNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAP=UV6rGy_+mKPmAKq7hFY5U2Y_pBYfUZWkzn6FNdGxsP35Lwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAxyauDF4vkCDi8pbt_GLMyWh2=8HoHenyv4ZeQA+j34k0wVmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP=UV6rALEju_imF5YN9eiPddx0ShbfbzHXk0E6Tded-ii58WQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 30 March 2012 17:41, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As there is no obvious restriction on the results of a CfD, I call for
> determination on the Rules.
No.
> Then I do so again, because I'd be
> disappointed if they hadn't changed in between these two sentences.
Yes.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business