Re: [s-b] [s-d] Movement

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

I argue that the intent of the quoted rule was that if the Victim leaves the 
game, or is unable to perform their duties for some reason, the Minister of 
Default is to take over. It was never intended for the Minister of Default to 
become the Minister of Crime the instant the post was created.


Besides, you actually WANT everybody (including ME) to be trying to kill you??




On another note, I request that the Rulekeepor exercise eir Power of Executive 
Tidiness and correct "Registra" to "Registrar" in Rule 83. I also request that 
the Registrar expedite eir processing of the Kick I delivered to 0x44 for the 
attempted IMPOSSIBLE Location change.



----- Original Message ----
> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 4:20:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b]   Movement
> 
> 
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
> 
> > And since I  have a potential conflict of interest in the CFI below, I will 
> > simply  present an argument to Judge teucer:
> > The Minister of Default NEVER  becomes the Minister of a vacant Ministry, 
>except 
>
> > by announcement. The  Minister of Default merely performs the duties of the 
> > vacant  ministry.
> 
> From the text of rule 83 
> 
> "If the Victim forfeits the  game or the ministry otherwise becomes vacant, 
>then the Minister of Default  immediately also becomes the Minister of  Crime."
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss  mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> 


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business