Gabriel Vistica on Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:17:30 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Movement

I give 0x44 a Kick in the Ass for attempting to change his Location to the 
Armory, as that move is impossible, per Rule 86.

Also, ANY PLAYER, not just current ministers, can claim vacant ministries by 
And who cares if anything would violate Truthiness? We don't have it! Rule 10 
says we have to follow the rules in the current ruleset, but it says nothing 
about having to follow rules that were, but no longer are, in the ruleset.

And since I have a potential conflict of interest in the CFI below, I will 
simply present an argument to Judge teucer:
The Minister of Default NEVER becomes the Minister of a vacant Ministry, except 
by announcement. The Minister of Default merely performs the duties of the 
vacant ministry.

----- Original Message ----
> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 4:05:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Movement
> On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:58 PM, 0x44 wrote:
> > I change my location to The  Armory. I change my location to The Servants 
> > 
> > I CFI  on: The Second change of location was effective.
> > Arguments:
> > 
> > If the Ministry of becomes Vacant in any way, the Minister of Default  
>immediately becomes the Minister of Crime.
> > 
> Upon creation of the  Ministry, I became the Minister of Crime. Ministers may 
>claim a vacant ministry  by announcement, or usurp a non-vacant ministry.  The 
>use of the word  "make" in Proposal 2046 does not meet the above requirements 
>for a Player  becoming a Minister. Additionally, the word make is used several 
>times within  the Ruleset to mean "announce publicly", a meaning that makes no 
>sense and would  violate Truthiness if we still had  it.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing  list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx

spoon-business mailing list