Craig Daniel on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:02:14 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Let's add some gameplay, shall we? |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Also, could you have the rule explicitly state that it refers to "the player >> >> compsciguy". I want to avoid problems with Rule 2. >> > >> > I hereby amend my recent proposal by replacing the string >> > {{compsciguy}} with {{the player compsciguy}}. >> > >> >> Just realized that's ambiguous, so I hereby amend it again, by >> replacing the string {{compsciguy}} with {{known only as >> "compsciguy"}}. > > Also incorrect. I'm sure other people (non-nomic-related) know em by > other names. That is a good point. I hereby amend said proposal yet again, replacing the string {{known only as "compsciguy"}} with {{compsciguy, who posts from gvistica@xxxxxxxxx,}}. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business