Craig Daniel on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:02:14 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Let's add some gameplay, shall we?


On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 09:53 -0400, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Also, could you have the rule explicitly state that it refers to "the player
>> >> compsciguy". I want to avoid problems with Rule 2.
>> >
>> > I hereby amend my recent proposal by replacing the string
>> > {{compsciguy}} with {{the player compsciguy}}.
>> >
>>
>> Just realized that's ambiguous, so I hereby amend it again, by
>> replacing the string {{compsciguy}} with {{known only as
>> "compsciguy"}}.
>
> Also incorrect. I'm sure other people (non-nomic-related) know em by
> other names.

That is a good point. I hereby amend said proposal yet again,
replacing the string {{known only as "compsciguy"}} with {{compsciguy,
who posts from gvistica@xxxxxxxxx,}}.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business