Craig Daniel on Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:40:21 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 171


On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:53 +0100, James Baxter wrote:
>> 2035 - "Add Prohibition Punishments!" (Marr965)
>> 2036 - "Rule 79" (Gitchel)
>> 2037 - "Evergreen" (Murphy)
>> 2038 - "Fix mentorship (this time for real)" (Murphy)
>> 2039 - "Vacuity" () [[submitted by the nameless player that plays from the email address teucer@xxxxxxxxx]]
>
> I vote AGAINST 2035. It's massively scammable, in that a conspiracy of
> two people, including the Rulekeepor, could break the rules, then one
> could become the Executioner for the other, then they could make the
> punishment anything they liked, including a complete dictatorship.
>
> I vote FOR 2036, FOR 2037, and FOR 2038; they all seem like sane fixes.
>
> I vote AGAINST 2039, because I don't see why someone should get proposal
> rewards from a proposal that does nothing.

I vote in the same manner as the player commonly called ais523, with
the exception that I vote FOR 2039. Obviously.

 -
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business