| Craig Daniel on Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:40:21 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 171 |
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:53 +0100, James Baxter wrote: >> 2035 - "Add Prohibition Punishments!" (Marr965) >> 2036 - "Rule 79" (Gitchel) >> 2037 - "Evergreen" (Murphy) >> 2038 - "Fix mentorship (this time for real)" (Murphy) >> 2039 - "Vacuity" () [[submitted by the nameless player that plays from the email address teucer@xxxxxxxxx]] > > I vote AGAINST 2035. It's massively scammable, in that a conspiracy of > two people, including the Rulekeepor, could break the rules, then one > could become the Executioner for the other, then they could make the > punishment anything they liked, including a complete dictatorship. > > I vote FOR 2036, FOR 2037, and FOR 2038; they all seem like sane fixes. > > I vote AGAINST 2039, because I don't see why someone should get proposal > rewards from a proposal that does nothing. I vote in the same manner as the player commonly called ais523, with the exception that I vote FOR 2039. Obviously. - _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business