0x44 on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:51:10 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 101/0 |
I answer CFI 101 SURE_WHY_NOT - 0x44 On Dec 19, 2009, at 17:17, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:04:11 -0500 From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [s-b] Ending the EmergencyOn Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:Action takes place as though universal entropy exceeded maximum entropy so the clock is off for 3 wdays before the list of eventsin rule 49.B.6 takes place.I submit a CFI: The old ndelay and the watch are equivalent, and so the delay mandated by rule 49.B.6 has already been satisfied. Evidence: the ndelay and the watch serve identical functions, as the measurement of how long the clock has been off for. I believe it is readily apparent that they are the same entity, merely with the name changed and the description of its function rewritten.I do the above ttPF. - teucerThis is CFI 101/0, I assign it to Judge 0x44. _________________________________________________________________ View your other email accounts from your Hotmail inbox. Add them now. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394592/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business