Re: [s-b] No.

Ed Murphy on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:07:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] No.

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] No.
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:05:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <45f964540910200947w38cf9274o9950ed302518222c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4ADDE222.7020301@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20910200941v4ea03f42ob697f6ed71ee5b31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45f964540910200947w38cf9274o9950ed302518222c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:

> 2009/10/20 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> (I haven't been keeping track of B for a while, so if any of this is
>>> or may be ineffective, then please let me know.)
>>>
>>> I become a player.
>>>
>>> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal the recent judgement claiming that
>>> Agora is at war with B.
>> I support.
>>
>> I sit.
> 
> Right, I support too.

Having received 2 support, I appeal the judgement in question.

I cease to be a player.  Let me know when B's rules become fundamentally
different from Agora's again.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] No.
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-b] No.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-b] No.
  - From: Jonatan Kilhamn

Prev by Date: [s-b] judicial switches
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] The current state of Our Game
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] No.
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] No.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread