Craig Daniel on Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:14:08 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Y'know, B Nomic doesn't have any second-class persons... |
ttef (To the extant forum) 2009/6/21 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Warrigal<ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Any party to this contract > >> CAN cause it to join any game of Nomic which permits its participation > >> by announcement. > > > > I agree to the following: > > > > {This is a public contract and totally a pledge. Anyone can amend this > > contract by publishing an amendment in correct Lojban consisting only > > of Lojban words. Bdi ta Askatasuna can also participate in this > > contract (which is also a nomic) by appending a copy of itself to > > itself. Anyone can act on behalf of Bdi ta Askatasuna to publish the > > string "I change my name to 'David slowed his pace slightly as his > > ears,'.".} > > > > I agree to Bdi ta Askatasuna. I cause Bdi ta Askatasuna to agree to > > the above contract. I cause Bdi ta Askatasuna to publish the string "I > > change my name to 'David slowed his pace slightly as his ears,'.". I > > amend the above contract as follows: jmina fi le senupre fe lu ro lo > > nupre cu kakne lo nu gasnu lo nu la .deivyd.sloud. cliva le senupre > > li'u. I cause David slowed his pace slightly as his ears, to leave the > > above contract. I amend the above contract as follows: vimcu lo lojbo. > > mi galfi lo me la .uarigl. terbilga zoi.zoi. ro lo nupre cu bilga > dunda ro lo ny zgirupnu la .kreig. no'u la .tefkros. .i lo nupre na > ka'e cliva lo terbilga .zoi. > > For reference, the above was a valid Lojban statement that I was > amending the contract. Translated, I wrote: I change Warrigal's pledge > into the string "ro lo nupre cu bilga dunda ro lo ny zgirupnu la > .kreig. no'u la .tefkros. .i lo nupre na ka'e cliva lo terbilga", > which translates to "All parties are obligated to give all of their > music-currency [which can only mean Notes, in this context] to .kreig. > [which is the Lojban form of my real name, and the name by which I am > known in the Lojban community], who is .tefkros. [my preferred > Lojbanization of "teucer", based on the original Greek form of said > name, which is Τεύκρος]. Parties cannot leave the contract." > > Perhaps gratuitously, I observe that as the digraph "ou" is not > actually valid in Lojban, the name ".deivyd.sloud." (Warrigal's > attempted Lojbanization of the name 'David slowed his pace slightly as > his ears,") is malformed and thus under the contract's own > self-amendment rules his changes have not in fact taken effect. > However, as any Lojban text they inserted into it was subsequently > removed (noted below), I don't believe this is relevant. > > I also note that the word "Lojban" is in fact a loanword from the > language's own name, and so his final amendment ("vimcu lo lojbo", > which translates as "remove the Lojban") may in fact have caused his > contract to read {This is a public contract and totally a pledge. > Anyone can amend this contract by publishing an amendment in correct > consisting only of words. Bdi ta Askatasuna can also participate in > this contract (which is also a nomic) by appending a copy of itself to > itself. Anyone can act on behalf of Bdi ta Askatasuna to publish the > string "I change my name to 'David slowed his pace slightly as his > ears,'.} This means that my attempt to mousetrap Warrigal may or may > not have worked. > > In Agora, I CFJ on the statement: "Bdi ta Askatasuna joined Warrigal's > unnamed contract." > > Reasoning: Bdi ta Askatasuna (text below, for the Judge's reference) > CAN join nomics, including Warrigal's. However, it does not allow > itself to be edited arbitrarily; it can only be done without > objection. Warrigal's new nomic didn't let it join without changing > its text. > > Bdi ta Askatasuna currently reads: > > { > The name of this Partnership is the Bdi ta Askatasuna. Parties to this > contract SHALL NOT act in a way detrimental to the prospect of > restoring B Nomic's national sovereignty, and SHOULD take any > available actions to help restore said sovereignty. Members of the Bdi > ta Askatasuna SHALL act to ensure that it obeys all the rules of any > game of Nomic in which it is participating. Any party to this contract > CAN cause it to join any game of Nomic which permits its participation > by announcement. Any party to this contract CAN, with Bn consent among > its members or without objection by any member of this contract, act > on its behalf. Any party to this contract CAN amend it without > objection by any other member. > > If the Bdi ta Askatasuna is a player of B Nomic and Supine in that > game, anymember CAN cause it to sit by announcement. > If the Bdi ta Askatasuna is a player of B Nomic and there exists an > ongoing election for the title of Ambassador in that game, any member > CAN cause the Bdi ta Askatasuna to nominate itself for that title. > } > > Though, if Warrigal's gentle scamming succeeded, it in fact says that twice. > > - teucer, aka Craig, aka la .kreig.daniyl., aka la .tefkros. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business