Justin Ahmann on Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:41:54 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1956-1962, report


That is quite strange.  Offhand, I'd guess I accidentally dragged the top part of the message to the bottom...

I vote FOR Proposal 1956.

Codae




________________________________
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2009 5:37:25 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1956-1962, report

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 15:32, Justin Ahmann<quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I vote for each proposal below as indicated on the line following the short description of each, respectively.
>
> Codae
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: B Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 3:47:14 PM
> Subject: [s-b] [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 1956-1962, report
>
>     FOR
>
> 1957 D 1 2.0 C-walker            <none>
>     PRESENT
>
> 1958 D 1 2.0 C-w                <none>
>     PRESENT
>
> 1959 D 1 2.0 C-walker            <none>
>     FOR
>
> 1960 D 1 2.0 C-walker            <none>
>     AGAINST
>
> 1961 O 1 1.0 Tiger              Burning all ribbons
>     AGAINST
>
> 1962 D 1 2.0 C-walker            <none>
>     FOR
>
>
> chamber: O = Ordinary; D = Democratic
> interest: 0-3 = interest index
>
> Proposal ID numbers:
>     highest orderly: 1962
>     disorderly: none
>

>
> The proposal pool is empty.
> --
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
> This distribution of proposals 1956-1962 initiates the Bn
> Decisions on whether to adopt them.  The eligible voters for ordinary
> proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
> proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector
> is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR, AGAINST,
> and PRESENT.
>
> NUM  C I AI  SUBMITTER          TITLE
> 1956 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ              Voting Power Overhaul
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>

This is garbled enough that I don't think you submitted a valid vote on 1956.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business