Re: [s-b] [s-d] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

B Nomic's game custom is to follow the text of the rules, even when it  
causes massive breakage, and a proprosal failing is hardly massive  
breakage.  There is no unilateral assumption about simultaneity in  
Agora-- if not for R105, simultaneous rule changes would be possible  
there too.  But that rule forbids them, there and, now, here, and--  
why should I hesitate to say it, in B of all places-- that's that.  I  
nominate myself for Rulekeepor.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 26, 2009, at 10:11 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> B Nomic's game custom explicitly permits simultaneous rule changes.  
> If the
> rule does not permit them, it is a regression artifact from the  
> unilateral
> assumption of Agora's ruleset.
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 09:33:55 -0400, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I intend to appeal this with two support.  Rule 105 explicitly
> > disallows simultaneous rule changes.  If those specified by the
> > proprosal are necessarily simultaneous, they cannot occur at all.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business