Re: [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44

[comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>]

I intend to appeal this with two support.  Rule 105 explicitly  
disallows simultaneous rule changes.  If those specified by the  
proprosal are necessarily simultaneous, they cannot occur at all.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 26, 2009, at 12:03 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Roger Hicks wrote:
> > This is CFJ 5. I assign it to Judge 0x44.
> >
> > 5 (District Inquiry)
> > The page at
> > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379
> > contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current
> > rules.
> The first line of Proposal 1945 states clearly that the entire  
> ruleset is to be replaced with the contents of the page at the above  
> historical Bn wiki link. To do so would require the complete removal  
> of the original ruleset and the subsequent (and necessarily  
> simultaneous) emplacement of the new rules. Since no individual rule  
> was specified, the ruleset was repealed and enacted in toto.  
> Additionally, it seems improper to set aside a UNANIMOUS decision on  
> a Democratic proposal, any ambiguity that may have arisen from  
> Proposal 1945 must be ignored in deference to the will of the Players.
>
> I answer CFJ 5 TRUE.
>
> --
> --
> 0x44;
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business