M P Darke on Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:21:28 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: Vote Power |
fine, I request a ZOT --- On Mon, 6/4/09, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Vote Power To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, 6 April, 2009, 6:51 PM 0x44 wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:27:44 +0000 (GMT), M P Darke > <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I answer this Consultation YES, but only because it make life simpler, as >> there is now a precedent. > > I claim this Answer to be Inconsistent, but only because I think another > priest will give a more reasoned Answer. You can't, the alleged Answer was NttPF. But yeah, Marr965, either re-post with actual reasoning or I'll be joining 0x44. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business