Re: [s-b] Wording it in a completely non-objectionable manner

[Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Warrigal <ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit a proposal, titled "Wording it in a completely
> non-objectionable manner":
>
> {Create a new rule, titled "Foolishness":
>
> {Those who have been foolish enough to agree to the ruleset of B Nomic
> on Agora are hereby burdened with the obligation to ensure that B
> Nomic follows the rules of Agora. If a party to the ruleset of B Nomic
> on Agora comes to their senses and ceases to be a party, this
> obligation no longer applies to them, as it's really a very silly
> obligation.}}
>
> This will make B Nomic a partnership and allow it to register. It will
> not allow Agora's rule of law to seep in and order anyone around,
> unless the orderees have decided they want to be ordered around for
> some reason.
>
> --Warrigal

So, the obligatory question. Why did you vote AGAINST this?

--Warrigal
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business