Re: [s-b] Status quo

[Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Point of Order:  Set the ruleset to match
>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Rules
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted.

I vote AGAINST.

> Point of Order:  Set the list of players and their attributes to match
>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Players
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted.
>
> Point of Order:  Set the list of ministers and their rewards to match
>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Ministries
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted.
>
> Point of Order:  Set the list of un-ZOTted un-Pondered Consultations
> and their attributes to match
>  http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Justice
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted.
>

I vote FOR the 3 PoOs above

> Point of Order:  Set the clock to what it would be if it had been
>  nday 10 nweek 155 nyear 16
> at the time this Point of Order was submitted, and had been continuously
> on since that time.

I vote AGAINST this PoO; it would move us to nweek 156 without nweek
155's proposals taking effect.


-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business