Justin Ahmann on Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:20:41 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Reassignment


I agree with Billy Pilgrim and ais523.  I claim this answer INCONSISTENT.

(I'd thought the dictatorship in the Consultation's Reasoning referred to ais523's scam from before the last Emergency--I didn't remember enough about that to feel comfortable answering.  Feel free to disregard this paragraph.)

Codae




________________________________
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: B Nomic - Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2009 4:25:19 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Reassignment

Ed Murphy wrote:
> Codae wrote:
> 
>  
>> I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation because there's probably someone out there who understands the situation better than I do.
>>    
> 
> I assign Consultation 203 to Priest j.
>  

I answer YES, Rule 5e57 still exists.

Per the Contract, "ais523 may modify this contract by appending the following text to rule 5e47, then repealing rule 5e57".

This is not grant any abilities to modify the ruleset, and should be parsed as, "ais523 may modify this contract after successfully becoming a dictator through other means."

j

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business