| bnomic on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:03:58 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Reassignment |
I claim J's below Answer to be INCONSISTENT. On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:28:19 -0500, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I claim j's below Answer to be INCONSISTENT. We've already gone through the > debate, I think ais523's scam worked, and that is why. > > BP > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Ed Murphy wrote: >> >>> Codae wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation because there's > probably >>>> someone out there who understands the situation better than I do. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I assign Consultation 203 to Priest j. >>> >>> >> >> I answer YES, Rule 5e57 still exists. >> >> Per the Contract, "ais523 may modify this contract by appending the >> following text to rule 5e47, then repealing rule 5e57". >> >> This is not grant any abilities to modify the ruleset, and should be > parsed >> as, "ais523 may modify this contract after successfully becoming a > dictator >> through other means." >> >> >> j >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-business mailing list >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business >> > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business