Re: [s-b] Hold it over

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I ZOT this Consultation, as being obviously true. Just ask next time. And
also, whoopee!

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:29 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> In response to this, I submit a Consultation:
> Is the Unbeliever named in a Consultation allowed to give reasons for their
> actions, if their actions are questioned in the Consultation?
> Unbeliever: Teucer (This is not because I'm afraid of the answer he will
> give, it's because I don't want biased answers.)
>
> --- On Fri, 23/1/09, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [s-b] Hold it over.
> To: "spoon-business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, 23 January, 2009, 3:08 PM
>
> I submit the following Consultation:
> {Question: Is the message quoted below spam?
> Unbeliever: Marr596
> Reasoning: When we want to discuss things, game custom is to do so on
> discussion fora precisely because this keeps the spoon-business
> archives from getting cluttered with irrelevancies.}
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Right, I've checked the rules, it's fine.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business