[s-b] Hold it over

[M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

In response to this, I submit a Consultation:
Is the Unbeliever named in a ConsultationÂallowed to give reasons for their actions, if their actions are questioned in the Consultation?
Unbeliever: Teucer (This is not because I'm afraid of the answer he will give, it's because I don't want biased answers.)

--- On Fri, 23/1/09, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] Hold it over.
To: "spoon-business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 23 January, 2009, 3:08 PM

I submit the following Consultation:
{Question: Is the message quoted below spam?
Unbeliever: Marr596
Reasoning: When we want to discuss things, game custom is to do so on
discussion fora precisely because this keeps the spoon-business
archives from getting cluttered with irrelevancies.}

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Right, I've checked the rules, it's fine.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business