Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:09:38 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player? |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, I'll buy it. But I would have preferred you had sealed off any > possibility of 9999 being the correct number by saying it's false anyway. > You would have been saying, "If that possibility is true, it's false." So > it > couldn't be true, then. But if you answer PARADOX, you are saying, "If the > possibility is true, then it's paradoxically so." > > I claim the answers to Consultations 9999 or 9999+i (whichever is the > number) to be CONSISTENT. I claim the answer to Consutlations 9999 and 9999+i to be CONSISTENT. I make each of the above claims individually, just so no one argues that the entire claim failed given that one of these (9999....) does not exist... BP _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business