Re: [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is all completely invalid. ehird forfeited and is not currently a 
player.


> I become Ordained. I assign this Consultation the number 9999. I 
> assign this consultation to ehird (myself).
>
> I answer this consultation YES.
>
> Reasoning: {
>
> 5E10 says [[Game Actions which involve calculating things that are 
> unreasonable, impossible or ambiguous fail and have no effect. 
> Determining what meets that criteria is up to Ministries and the 
> Consultation system.]]
>
> Now, we all know about the ambiguity of my macks (see the arguments 
> over that consultation, the various valid thoughts given on it, etc.)
>
> My forfeit involves calculating the ambiguous state of my macks as a 
> direct consequence of it.
>
> Therefore, my forfeit was ineffective. 5E18 does not apply as it has a 
> lower number than 5E10.
>
> }
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business