Charles Schaefer on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:09:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Assignments of Consultations 179-187 |
2008/12/31, Warrigal ihope127+w@xxxxxxxxx: > > > Consultation 184: > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ehird wants to know what happened to eir mackerel. I think they're > > gone, but the rules don't make this happen explicitly, so why not use > > the judgment system to find out? I submit the following Consultation: > > > > {Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?} > > The eligible priests are BobTHJ, Tyler, w1n5t0n, 0x44, JamesB, Murphy, > and Billy Pilgrim. My seven-sided die says 3, so I assign Consultation > 184 to w1n5t0n. Answer: NO. Reasoning: The rules are silent on this matter, so I will legislate from the bench. When a player forfeits, their mackerel cease to exist. The answer to this specific consultation arguably would have been YES if ehird had transferred any mackerel to anyone since the era reset, but I can find no evidence that he did so. -- > w1n5t0n aka > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business