Craig Daniel on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:02:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: ehird's macks |
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:55 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:51:47 -0500 >> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx >> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks >> >> Ehird wants to know what happened to eir mackerel. I think they're >> gone, but the rules don't make this happen explicitly, so why not use >> the judgment system to find out? I submit the following Consultation: >> >> {Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?} Noting that ownable game objects can in theory be owned by Nobody, they don't need to get destroyed despite the lack of a provision for said destruction. On the other hand, only legal entities may own currency, though, so they can't be Nobody's - at least, I don't think so. I submit the following follow-up consultation: {Are the Mackerel formerly owned by ehird now owned by Nobody?} > The Oracle hasn't assigned any consultations recently so your consultation might not get processed. > > Support my intention to make the post of Oracle vacant. I support JamesB's attempt to make the Oracle vacant. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business