Craig Daniel on Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:02:48 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation: ehird's macks


On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:55 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:51:47 -0500
>> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks
>>
>> Ehird wants to know what happened to eir mackerel. I think they're
>> gone, but the rules don't make this happen explicitly, so why not use
>> the judgment system to find out? I submit the following Consultation:
>>
>> {Are there any Mackerel formerly owned by ehird?}

Noting that ownable game objects can in theory be owned by Nobody,
they don't need to get destroyed despite the lack of a provision for
said destruction. On the other hand, only legal entities may own
currency, though, so they can't be Nobody's - at least, I don't think
so.

I submit the following follow-up consultation:

{Are the Mackerel formerly owned by ehird now owned by Nobody?}

> The Oracle hasn't assigned any consultations recently so your consultation might not get processed.
>
> Support my intention to make the post of Oracle vacant.

I support JamesB's attempt to make the Oracle vacant.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business