Re: [s-b] Further consultations on the Sharpener

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Scratch the 167 assignment, it was obviously invalid (did not match the
random roll). What I meant to say was:

>
>> Below is Consultation 167. I assign it to Priest ehird.
>>
>>> {Question: Did the Pencil Sharpener do anything at all?
>>> Unbeliever: comex
>>> Arguments: If the Sharpener procedure that destroys mackerel doesn't
>>> succeed in doing so, it could be taken to mean that the entire
>>> procedure failed. More likely, however, each step gets implemented as
>>> a game action, and either works or doesn't; in this case, the Pencil
>>> Sharpener did everything it was supposed to including plugging the
>>> loophole, but comex is still the richest player in the game (followed
>>> by me and Warrigal).}
>>
>>
>> Oracle Billy Pilgrim
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business