Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:20:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Further consultations on the Sharpener |
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I submit the following Consultations: > > > Below is Consultation 164. I assign it to Priest Ty-Guy6. > >> {Question: Are mackerel fungible? >> Arguments: The answer ought to be yes, though I see nothing in the >> rules to establish that it is. There's a Consultation precedent >> supporting yes, though; if they're not fungible we could not have >> built the Laser Printer, which comex judged that we had.} >> > > Below is Consultation 165. I assign it to Priest Murphy. > >> {Question: Does there exist a square with the color (255,255,255)? >> Unbeliever: ehird >> Arguments: This hinges on whether ehird's right that comex couldn't >> reuse mackerel-spending or not.} >> > > Below is Consultation 166. I assign it to Priest 0x44. > >> {Were any mackerel successfully destroyed by the Pencil Sharpener? >> Unbeliever: comex >> Arguments: The arguments in my previous consultation established that >> if the Laser Printer worked (which it did) then the Pencil Sharpener >> failed to specify its procedure concretely enough. Given the >> fungibility of mackerel, "m30000 in the possession of comex" is >> sufficiently specific, but "all mackerel created by the laser printer >> is not." (If macks were non-fungible, the latter would be valid but >> not the former; were this the case the Sharpener couldn't have been >> built.} > > > Below is Consultation 167. I assign it to Priest 0x44. > >> {Question: Did the Pencil Sharpener do anything at all? >> Unbeliever: comex >> Arguments: If the Sharpener procedure that destroys mackerel doesn't >> succeed in doing so, it could be taken to mean that the entire >> procedure failed. More likely, however, each step gets implemented as >> a game action, and either works or doesn't; in this case, the Pencil >> Sharpener did everything it was supposed to including plugging the >> loophole, but comex is still the richest player in the game (followed >> by me and Warrigal).} > > > Oracle Billy Pilgrim > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business