| Charles Schaefer on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:30:09 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments |
2008/12/14, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Jamie Dallaire > <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > > >> I submit the following Consultation. > >> > >> * Question: Does the question from Consultation 159 have to do with > >> a matter of interpretation of the rules? > >> > >> * Unbeliever: ehird > >> > >> (I'm arguing for NO. The process of answering it has to do with a > >> matter of interpretation of Rule 5E36, but that's not the same thing.) > > > > > This is Consultation 161. I assign it to Priest Charles. > > Oracle Billy Pilgrim Answer: NO, for the reason submitted by the Supplicant. -- > Charles Schaefer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business