Alex Smith on Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:49:44 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] MoM reset |
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 16:46 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > > > I believe the entire original transaction fails because I couldn't > > regain the MoM. So I didn't vacate, so nobody else had a shot. > > > > Hmmmm now THAT is a paradox... Submitting actions at different future times > within a single transaction... We need to plug that ASAP. You only vacated > the MoM if you were able to regain it later. You were only able to regain it > later if no one took it in the interval. No one took it in the interval only > if you didn't vacate it. Yep, my transaction in this thread would have been a paradox if the MoM was vacated at the time. Because I love a good paradox: BEGIN TRANSACTION At 21:55 UTC, I transfer m1 to comex. At 21:55 UTC on December 10, 2199, I transfer m1 to comex. END TRANSACTION -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business