Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency

Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:33:18 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:33:08 -0400
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650810200931rb8d1e6dwf9ba2b8dd153b99f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240810200738r3a28df14m2b0aa3c2a04d1601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48FCA8AC.3010401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240810200853q50318bb5mc70de491200800ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48FCAF14.7030309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F9FEFFDB-426A-4C8A-9441-5D28DBE8D732@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810200931rb8d1e6dwf9ba2b8dd153b99f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Besides, wouldn't Wooble's proposition, if true, imply that pretty much
> every emergency we've had (at least since I got here) has been invalid, and
> some really really old emergency has only just now been initiated? And if
> so, shouldn't we be using some really really old emergency procedure rules?

I am Hitting My Panic Button.  :-P
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] Emergency
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-b] Emergency
  - From: Jay Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Emergency
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] Emergency
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Emergency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread