Re: [s-b] Consultation assignments

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Although it costs me a sock, I find this answer Consistent.


Craig Daniel wrote:
>> teucer to Consultation 130 "At the time of submission of this
>> consultation, is the player named Charles the only player with a Baby
>> Blue sock?" (was Phil's)
>>     
>
> Answer: YES.
>
> Reasoning: I find the logic behind j's old ruling persuasive - but for
> the fact that it is missing a key step which invalidates his premise.
> As I understand the rules, the fact that only a corporation can
> willfully destroy socks does not mean that the socks cannot be
> destroyed by the actions of the rules as those rules are traditionally
> understood to operate. I must therefore agree with those who found his
> old ruling inconsistent and overturn j's previous Answer. It is thus
> my contention that socks vanish when their sockholders cease to be
> players.
>
> Oracularity: To clarify the above and prevent further confusion, the
> following text will be added to the end of rule 4E86:
> {
>
> When a player leaves the game, all of their socks are automatically destroyed.
> }
>
>  - teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business