comex on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:56:31 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Let's try that again while we still can |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my opinion, officers are obligated to act on behalf of their > corporations, but only in ways those corporations themselves may act. > Corporations are subservient to the contracts that define them. The only > way for an entity to be obligated by a contract is to be directly bound > to it, or for a chain of contractual text to delegate control elsewhere. > Naming an entity an officer does not put them under any obligations > except to send notice to the public forum of actions the corporations > themselves are performing under their own authority. I create the following contract: { 1. This contract is the Articles of Incorporation for comex's Mersenne Prime Corporation (cMPC). 2. j is an Officer of cMPC. 3. cMPC shall, before 2008-10-15 00:00:00 UTC, post a number n greater than 43,112,609 such that (2^n)-1 is prime. 4. Nobody can become bound to this contract. Any party to this contract can cease to become bound to it as a Game Action. } _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business