0x44 on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:28:11 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] C Nomic


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> Thank you very much. I guess you're right about the current proposals on C. I do think that 493 and 494 become redundant if they pass and the oracularity is then pondered, though.
>   
I claim the answer to Consultation 131 is CONSISTENT. Very nice work 
with handling the B/C Game Object split.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business