Re: [s-b] C Nomic

Charles Schaefer on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] C Nomic

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] C Nomic
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:32 -0700
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650810100921r669d8ee0k3cc16500095941ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48EBD2EE.7000908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810071452v38251457n43503f4e0a261bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810100921r669d8ee0k3cc16500095941ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 I claim Billy Pilgrim's answer to Consultation 131 as CONSISTENT, and as Da
Boss, cause VFS to transfer him m75 for a very well written reasoning and
oracularity, which I believe do not invalidate the intent of any of the
current proposals involving C Nomic.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] C Nomic
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-b] C Nomic
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-b] C Nomic
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-b] C Nomic
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Brick Red/Baby Blue Dividends
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] C Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] C Nomic
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] C Nomic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread