Re: [s-b] C Nomic

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I, C Nomic Player Wooble, submit the following:
>
> BEGIN TRANSACTION
>
> Assertion: The name of this game is C Nomic.
>
> I gain the Ordained property.
> I take the Ministry of Law.
> I assign Tyler's cross-nomic Consultation a number of 131 and a Priest
> of Wooble, the only Ordained player.
>
> I Anwer this Consultation as False. Proposal 485 said any *changes* the
> the gamestate would happen simultaneously, but C Nomic was not initially
> populated with Game Objects except those created by the Rules (e.g. Sock
> Corporations).
>
> END TRANSACTION
>
> Consultation 131 becomes Answered in C Nomic, and per rule 4E83, in B
> Nomic.


Not so fast, Skippy! I request to join C Nomic as a Player with the uniquely
identifying Plaayer Name bad_leprechaun. I declare the Answer to the above
Consultation to be INCONSISTENT with established doctrine.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business