Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:00:51 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Voting FOR 2 'officer' motions


I vote FOR this Motion. Don't forget to resolve it! (and all the other
motions)

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Perfect. That's just what was needed. Everything has been resolved, almost.
> (see below)
>
> I just noticed a little mistake I made in that paragraph 3 addition. Those
> automatically passed motions are not necessarily resolved, and so they may
> become failed after 6 rdays still. I post, and vote FOR on, the following
> Motion for the Articles of Incorporation of Black Corporation:
>
> { Title: Fix Paragraph 3 Bug
>
> Amend paragraph 3 to read (changed text in *bold*): 3. Any Voting
> Sockholder
> may attempt to amend this contract by posting a Motion by announcement. The
> Motion is a Game Document and should specify a list of Contract Actions.
> Each Voting Sockholder may cast a single vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN on
> this contract's Motions. After two full rdays, the Voting Sockholder who
> initiated the Motion may resolve that Motion. If a Motion is not resolved
> in
> six full rdays after it is announced it automatically fails. When a Motion
> is resolved if the total number of FOR votes is greater than the number of
> AGAINST votes the changes described in the Motion are enacted. If at any
> time all Voting Sockholders have voted FOR a Motion, and it has not failed,
> it *is automatically resolved*.
> }
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > I'm a little fuzzy about precisely what has occured with Black
> Corporation
> > motions and my attempt to pay myself for the socks... Especially since I
> > don't think, concerning that attempt, that we can just "call it a
> > motion"...
> > so, since I am now the Chamberlain, I do the following which should make
> it
> > moot:
> >
> > I vote FOR all motions in the Black Corporation.
> >
> > BEGIN TRANSACTION
> > Assertion: Black Corporation has not transferred any macks to Billy
> Pilgrim
> > within the past 6 rdays.
> > Action: As Chamberlain, acting on behalf of the Black Corporation, I
> > transfer (that is, the Black Corporation transfers) m200 to Billy
> Pilgrim.
> > END TRANSACTION
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > I vote FOR my motion to install the two of us to office. It
> automatically
> > > passes.
> > > I vote FOR my motion "Limit Officers." Now you vote for it.
> > >
> > > --
> > >  -Tyler
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-business mailing list
> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
>
>
>
> --
>   -Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business