Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:00:51 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Voting FOR 2 'officer' motions |
I vote FOR this Motion. Don't forget to resolve it! (and all the other motions) On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perfect. That's just what was needed. Everything has been resolved, almost. > (see below) > > I just noticed a little mistake I made in that paragraph 3 addition. Those > automatically passed motions are not necessarily resolved, and so they may > become failed after 6 rdays still. I post, and vote FOR on, the following > Motion for the Articles of Incorporation of Black Corporation: > > { Title: Fix Paragraph 3 Bug > > Amend paragraph 3 to read (changed text in *bold*): 3. Any Voting > Sockholder > may attempt to amend this contract by posting a Motion by announcement. The > Motion is a Game Document and should specify a list of Contract Actions. > Each Voting Sockholder may cast a single vote FOR, AGAINST, or ABSTAIN on > this contract's Motions. After two full rdays, the Voting Sockholder who > initiated the Motion may resolve that Motion. If a Motion is not resolved > in > six full rdays after it is announced it automatically fails. When a Motion > is resolved if the total number of FOR votes is greater than the number of > AGAINST votes the changes described in the Motion are enacted. If at any > time all Voting Sockholders have voted FOR a Motion, and it has not failed, > it *is automatically resolved*. > } > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire > <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > I'm a little fuzzy about precisely what has occured with Black > Corporation > > motions and my attempt to pay myself for the socks... Especially since I > > don't think, concerning that attempt, that we can just "call it a > > motion"... > > so, since I am now the Chamberlain, I do the following which should make > it > > moot: > > > > I vote FOR all motions in the Black Corporation. > > > > BEGIN TRANSACTION > > Assertion: Black Corporation has not transferred any macks to Billy > Pilgrim > > within the past 6 rdays. > > Action: As Chamberlain, acting on behalf of the Black Corporation, I > > transfer (that is, the Black Corporation transfers) m200 to Billy > Pilgrim. > > END TRANSACTION > > > > Billy Pilgrim > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I vote FOR my motion to install the two of us to office. It > automatically > > > passes. > > > I vote FOR my motion "Limit Officers." Now you vote for it. > > > > > > -- > > > -Tyler > > > _______________________________________________ > > > spoon-business mailing list > > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-business mailing list > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > > > > > > -- > -Tyler > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business