Re: [s-b] [s-d] [Fwd: chess purchase tweak]

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
> > Also, your tweak was never actually activated as far as I can tell. We're
> > getting there! :-)
> >
> I was waiting for objection. By now I object to it myself again and
> won't activate it. I'm tweaked out for the nweek so can you sponsor
> something sane?
>

Not sure you can object to something you already did. Not sure if you did
activate it so:  I OBJECT to any Tweak ever activated by j.

Yes, I could sponsor something else though I won't have time to write it
tonight most likely. If u copy something to me I can do it.

>
> And would anyone support tossing out purchasing in favor of giving
> players with a king and empty space two(?) free rolls? Two ministries
> have to track it, and backtrack when things go wrong (like purchases
> that can't happen).
>
> The Mack tie-in might be rewards for murderizing pieces instead. Or a
> contract for side-bets on piece longevity.


Yeah, I'd support something like that if you came up with something workable
and tried it as a proposal.
Maybe even "purchasing" (without macks) could be free (e.g. 2 per turn or
something) + tied into murderizing pieces.... e.g. murder a piece, get one
of your own. ---> could it be: murder a pawn, get a pawn, murder a bishop,
get a bishop, etc.? maybe not for kings though as that could get abusive....
maybe a mack reward for kings?

bp
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business