Re: [s-b] [s-d] Divine Injunction

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >The
>  > Oracle may create a new Divine Injunction, or modify an existing
>  > Divine Injunction with two support.
>
>  I think a comma before "with two support" is necessary, unless the
>  intent is to allow creation without support and only modification with
>  support.
>
>  Actually, dropping the comma that's there is probably more correct and
>  would have the same effect as adding one, I think.

I modify my proposal "Divine Injunctions" by dropping the above reference comma.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business