Re: [s-b] Consultation: Usurping

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >  >  > {{
>  >  >  > Unbeliever: Billy Pilgrim
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Is 2 support required to usurp a ministry with a retainer less than or
>  >  >  > equal to zero?
>  >  >  > }}
>
>  I believe my Answer to another Consultation basically answered this one.
>
>  I Answer NO.  Rule 4E48 states "As a Game Action a Player may usurp a
>
> Ministry whose Retainer is less than or equal to 0, unless that Player
>  has held that Ministry during the current or previous nweek or the
>  current Minister (if any) is their twin."  No other part of this rule
>  explicitly modifies the authority of a Player who's not disqualified
>  from using this mechanism by virtue of their past ministership or DNA
>  to usurp in this way.  Rule 4E22 applies to actions that "must" be
>  performed with support, not actions that may be performed generally
>  and also may be performed with support.
>
>  Oracularity: {{Set the gamestate to what it would be if the above
>  answer and reasoning were correct [which I'm pretty sure is what the
>  Public Displays reflect at the moment]}}
>
This Consultation became pondered on Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:00 and the
above Oracularity takes effect.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business