Roger Hicks on Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:31:52 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Logical Hand Grenade: 5 Seconds Later |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2008 10:06 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2008 5:00 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I submit the following Consultation: > > > { > > > Question: At the time this Consultation is submitted, is it possible for > > > Billy Pilgrim to Vote on an Open Proposal? > > > > > > Reasoning: Are we in a Voting Period or not? > > > > > > Unbeliever: Hose > > > } > > > > This is Consultation #115. I assign it to Priest Wooble, whose name > > has now come up for the fourth time in a row in my random priest > > selections. > > This hinges on the meaning of "possible"; clearly Billy Pilgrim is a > Player and it's possible for him to vote on an Open proposal at any > time. > > I'll charitably interpret the Question to be equivalent to "Are any > Proposals Open?" based on the Reasoning, and answer NO. The Vote > Period for this nweek has not yet begun. I hold that Rule 4E48 > defines two separate Game Actions in its last two sentences, each > beginning with "As a Game Action", and that neither of these sentences > has any bearing on the effectiveness of the other. > > Gratuitous Oracularity: > > {{ > Set the gamestate to what it would be if what I just said. > }} > This consultation became pondered on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00, and the above Oracularity takes effect. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business