| Roger Hicks on Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:31:52 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Logical Hand Grenade: 5 Seconds Later |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 10:06 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2008 5:00 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I submit the following Consultation:
> > > {
> > > Question: At the time this Consultation is submitted, is it possible for
> > > Billy Pilgrim to Vote on an Open Proposal?
> > >
> > > Reasoning: Are we in a Voting Period or not?
> > >
> > > Unbeliever: Hose
> > > }
> >
> > This is Consultation #115. I assign it to Priest Wooble, whose name
> > has now come up for the fourth time in a row in my random priest
> > selections.
>
> This hinges on the meaning of "possible"; clearly Billy Pilgrim is a
> Player and it's possible for him to vote on an Open proposal at any
> time.
>
> I'll charitably interpret the Question to be equivalent to "Are any
> Proposals Open?" based on the Reasoning, and answer NO. The Vote
> Period for this nweek has not yet begun. I hold that Rule 4E48
> defines two separate Game Actions in its last two sentences, each
> beginning with "As a Game Action", and that neither of these sentences
> has any bearing on the effectiveness of the other.
>
> Gratuitous Oracularity:
>
> {{
> Set the gamestate to what it would be if what I just said.
> }}
>
This consultation became pondered on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00, and the
above Oracularity takes effect.
BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business