| Roger Hicks on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:37:17 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Consultation: Usurping |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 8:16 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I submit the following Consultation:
> >
> > {{
> > Unbeliever: Billy Pilgrim
> >
> > Is 2 support required to usurp a ministry with a retainer less than or
> > equal to zero?
> > }}
> >
> > Reasoning:
> > In Rule 48, there is the following sentence which I will name as A:
> >
> > "As a Game Action a Player may usurp a Ministry whose Retainer is less
> > than or equal to 0, unless that Player has held that Ministry during
> > the current or previous nweek or the current Minister (if any) is
> > their twin."
> >
> > There is also the following sentence which I will name as B:
> >
> > "As a Game Action with 2 Support a Player may usurp a Ministry whose
> > Retainer is less than or equal to 0."
> >
> > B applies additional restrictions to A and thus reads as such:
> >
> > "As a Game Action with 2 Support a Player may usurp a Ministry whose
> > Retainer is less than or equal to 0, unless that Player has held that
> > Ministry during the current or previous nweek or the current Minister
> > (if any) is their twin."
> >
> > It is incorrect to read is this way:
> >
> > if ( Retainer == 0 )
> > {
> > if ( Player has held Ministry during the nweek )
> > {
> > May usurp with 2 support
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > May usurp.
> > }
> > }
> >
> > A and B are in separate paragraphs and there is no wording that
> > creates this association. If that was the intent, it should have been
> > stated differently.
> >
>
> This is Consultation #116. I assign it to Priest Codae.
>
> Oracle BobTHJ
>
As the previous priest has requested this consultation be ZOTTED, and
since I believe it is not ZOT worthy, I re-assign it to Priest Wooble.
Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business