[s-b] Proposal: Ordainment

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

I submit the following proposal titled, "Ordainment":

{{
[[
If you don't want to be a Priest, you shouldn't have to be a priest. If you
don't perform your duties as a Priest, you are locked out from being a
Priest until the next nweek.
]]

Dependency: Proposal 363, refactoring activity

Amend Rule 18 by adding the following text in an appropriate location:
{{
An Active Player, as a Game Action, may gain the Ordained Property. Any
Player, as a Game Action, may remove their Ordained Property. Any Player
that loses the Active Property also loses the Ordained Property.
}}
and by replacing the following text:
{{
All Active Players, except the Supplicant, the Unbeliever if the
Consultation names one, the Oracle and Players that have already been
selected as Priests for that Consultation, are eligible for selection as
Priests.
}}
with
{{
All Ordained Players, except the Supplicant, the Unbeliever if the
Consultation names one, the Oracle and Players that have already been
selected as Priests for that Consultation, are eligible for selection as
Priests.
}}
and by replacing the following text:
{{
Any Priest which has not answered a consultation he has been assigned to
within a Jiffy ceases to be the Priest for that Consultation.
}}
with
{{
Any Priest, who is not the Oracle and has not answered a Consultation he has
been assigned to within a Jiffy, ceases to be the Priest for any
Consultations he is assigned to and loses the Ordained Property. If a Player
loses the Ordained Property in this manner, he cannot regain the Ordained
Property until the next nweek.
}}
}}

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business