Roger Hicks on Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:27:16 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation: A Real Paradox This Time |
On Feb 4, 2008 2:29 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/4/08, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 1:43 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:44 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > I submit the following Consultation: > > > > { > > > > At the beginning of nday 8, nweek 134, would it have been possible for > > the Player named Peter to claim Consultation 43 Consistent? > > > > > > > > Reasoning: There have been two nday 8, nweek 134s--one before ZOTTING > > the Consultation, and the other afterward. > > > > } > > > > > > This is Consultation #102. I assign it to Priest Anything McGee. > > > > > > Oracle BobTHJ > > > > > I re-assign this Consultation to Priest Billy Pilgrim > > > I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation on the grounds that it is > malformed. By this, I mean that it is unclear as to which instance of nday 8 > of nweek 134 it refers to. By its own admission, there were to such > instances, yet this Consultation makes no effort to specify its target. > As requested by the Priest, I hereby ZOT Consultation #102. Oracle BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business