Re: [s-b] Consultation: A Real Paradox This Time

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/4/08, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 1:43 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:44 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > > I submit the following Consultation:
> > > {
> > > At the beginning of nday 8, nweek 134, would it have been possible for
> the Player named Peter to claim Consultation 43 Consistent?
> > >
> > > Reasoning: There have been two nday 8, nweek 134s--one before ZOTTING
> the Consultation, and the other afterward.
> > > }
> >
> > This is Consultation #102. I assign it to Priest Anything McGee.
> >
> > Oracle BobTHJ
> >
> I re-assign this Consultation to Priest Billy Pilgrim


I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation on the grounds that it is
malformed. By this, I mean that it is unclear as to which instance of nday 8
of nweek 134 it refers to. By its own admission, there were to such
instances, yet this Consultation makes no effort to specify its target.

Priest Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business