Re: [s-b] Consultation 2

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I answer Consultation 100 No.

>From Rule 18:

Consultations are Game Documents that contain a Question

Consultation 99 did not contain a Question; rather, it contained a series of English words that do not form a coherent structure when arranged in the manner in which Wooble arranged them.  Therefore, Consultation 99 was not a Consultation, and could not have been used to achieve a Win by Paradox.

Codae

----- Original Message ----
From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 6:52:46 PM
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation 2

On Jan 28, 2008 1:59 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation:
>
> {{
> Does Wooble have a win by Paradox?
> }}
>
> Unbeliever: Murphy
>
> Argument:
> The Trigger for a Win by Paradox is "A Consultation on the possibility
> or legality of an action is logically impossible to correctly answer
> either Yes or No."
>
> Whether the "action" is a Game Action or any action (such as, say,
> writing even numbers as the sum of two primes) is not stated
> explicitly, and it's not capitalized per Game Custom when referring
> specifically to things as defined within the Game.
>
> I'd also argue against the possibility of such a win being revoked by
> Zotting; the trigger is the existence of the Consultation, not its
> Answer or its continued existence as Pending.
>
This is Consultation #100. I assign it to Priest Codae.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business