Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: So we can win by paradox

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I revise the proposal "So we can win by paradox" to read:

{
> > In Rule 4E18 (Judgment), replace the text:
> > {{
> > The selected Priest shall find inspiration in his knowledge of the Rules
> > and, as a Game Action, Answer his assigned Consultation YES or NO.
> > }}
> > by:
> > {{
> > The selected Priest shall find inspiration in his knowledge of the Rules
> > and, as a Game Action, Answer his assigned Consultation YES, NO, or , in
> > cases where neither of these two answers can potentially be logically
> > correct, PARADOX.
> > }}
> > and replace the text:
> > {{
> > For the purposes of answering Consultations the words "True",
> > "Affirmative"
> > and "Correct" are to be considered synonymous with "Yes", and the words
> > "False", "Negative" and "Incorrect" are to be considered synonymous with
> > "No".
> > }}
> > by:
> > {{
> > For the purposes of answering Consultations the words "True",
> > "Affirmative"
> > and "Correct" are to be considered synonymous with "Yes", the words
> > "False",
> > "Negative" and "Incorrect" are to be considered synonymous with "No",
> > and
> > the words "Maybe", "Undecidable" and "Göd Knows" are to be considered
> > synonymous with "Paradox".
> > }}
> >
> > Change the Trigger of the "Win by Paradox" Victory Condition to read:
> > {{
> > A Consultation on the possibility or legality of a Game Action is
> > Pondered with
> > an Answer of PARADOX.
> > }}
> >
>  }
>
> Billy "Don't forget the umlaut!" Pilgrim
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business