Re: [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 21, 2008 11:58 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 3:36 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I submit the following Consultation since the other one got zotted:
> >
> > {{
> > Can we merge any forked state that may exist from Rule 41?
> >
> > Unbeliever: 0x44
> > }}
> >
> > I recommend the following Oracularity
> > {{
> > Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules:
> > {{
> > There is no Rule 4E41.
> > }}
> > Repeal any Rule that has no text.
> > }}
> > }}
>
> This is Consultation #93. I assign it to Priest Dominov.
>
> BobTHJ
>
I re-assign this Consultation to Priest Anything McGee

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business