Re: [s-b] Consultation: Again the Rule

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 21, 2008 3:36 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation since the other one got zotted:
>
> {{
> Can we merge any forked state that may exist from Rule 41?
>
> Unbeliever: 0x44
> }}
>
> I recommend the following Oracularity
> {{
> Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules:
> {{
> There is no Rule 4E41.
> }}
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.
> }}
> }}

This is Consultation #93. I assign it to Priest Dominov.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business