[s-b] Consultation 85: Answer

["Anything McGee" <anythingmcgee@xxxxxxxxx>]

Greetings. My Answer to Cons. 85 is below:

Answer: TRUE.

Rule 35 states that a device "is a type of game object." Rule 2 states
that "Game Objects can only be created, destroyed, or modified if
allowed by the Rules, in a manner explicitly governed by the Rules."
And Rule 35 allows only one method of destroying a device: "The owner
of a device may destroy it by expressing the wish to do so in a public
forum."

Thus, the Rapier that was owned by the Player pikhq still exists in B
Nomic and there were more than four Rapiers at the time of the
Consultation's submission.

[[The Unbeliever in this Consultation also informally asked who the
owner of the loose Rapier is, and I choose not to provide a definitive
or official response to that question. My initial thought is that the
"device owner" Attribute is simply null. Perhaps a Proposal is in
order to clarify this sort of situation.]]



Cheers,
Anything McGee
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business