Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.

ihope on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:39:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 18:39:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <7e0dd3e00801011501n781d7b6w5b22dbeca09ec19b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <477A5B28.1000301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7e0dd3e00801011501n781d7b6w5b22dbeca09ec19b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 1, 2008 6:01 PM, Anything McGee <anythingmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Cheers, all. Following is my Answer to Consultation 82--it turned out
> to be the opposite of what I first expected when I read the
> Consultation.
>
> Answer: FALSE.

I claim this Answer to be Consistent.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] Devices Consultation.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.
  - From: Anything McGee

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.
Next by Date: [s-b] Proposal: I, for one, am NOT going on a zombie hunt!
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] Devices Consultation.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread