Justin Ahmann on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:47:55 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work? |
I claim this INCONSISTENT. I defer to Billy Pilgrim's reasoning. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2008 3:48:51 PM Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work? On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is Consultation 80. I assign it to Priest Murphy. > > The most natural reading of "maximum number of hit points" is "maximum > number of hit points that the rules permit that player to have". There > is no such limit, so I answer Yes. > > Oracularity: > > Amend Rule 24 (RPG) by replacing "and a default value of 10" with "a > default value of 10, and a default maximum of 10". > > Each player with more than 10 Hit Points has their Hit Points set to 10. > I claim this to be Consistent with established doctrine. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business